Building the regression suite
We build a scenario suite covering the critical business flows. Coverage is prioritised by business impact and usage frequency.
We verify on every release that working functionality has not broken.
Request an assessmentRegression testing verifies whether new development has broken existing functionality. We build the regression suite, execute it on every release and report the results in a form that supports the release decision. Scope is refreshed each cycle according to the impact of the change.
In most organisations regression testing is the longest step in the release calendar. As the suite grows, execution time rises; as execution time rises, release frequency falls. Narrowing scope shortens the run but raises the rate of defects reaching production.
We resolve that trade-off through correct prioritisation and parallel execution rather than by cutting scope. We identify the areas a change affects, and choose between the full suite and an impact-based suite according to release type.
We build a scenario suite covering the critical business flows. Coverage is prioritised by business impact and usage frequency.
On every release we determine which areas the change affects. The scope to be executed is selected from that analysis.
Stable scenarios run through automation; scenarios requiring judgement are executed manually. Results from both are combined in one report.
We shorten execution time through parallel runs. The execution plan is built to fit inside your release window.
We reflect changed functionality into the suite and remove scenarios that are no longer valid. Suite growth is kept under control.
We plan around your release rhythm, manage the operation and improve it in every cycle.
We define scope, test levels and success criteria against your release calendar. Environment and test data requirements are resolved before the work begins.
We take on team, tool and environment management. Progress is reported regularly against defined KPIs.
We run the tests and prioritise the findings. We track closure together with your development teams.
At the end of every cycle we review scope, automation rate and escaped defect rate. The priorities for the next cycle are set from that review.
We run regression executions with AutoRunner. Intelligent parallel execution shortens run time, and centralised test management brings scope and result tracking into one structure. If you want regression scope tied to requirement changes, RabbitQA establishes requirement to test traceability.
Running the full suite on every release usually creates unnecessary time cost. We run an impact-based suite for small changes and the full suite for major releases. The selection criteria are set as a rule at the start of the engagement.
The gain depends on your current scope, your automation rate and your infrastructure capacity. In the assessment conversation we look at your current execution time and calculate the expected gain together. We do not commit to an unverified figure.
Suite maintenance is part of the service. We remove scenarios that are no longer valid and merge overlapping ones. The goal is to cover the risk, not to grow the suite.
Yes. Scenarios unsuited to automation are executed manually. Both methods are combined under one execution plan and one report.

Complete the form and we will discuss your current execution time, your suite coverage and your release frequency.